| To: | Cheng Jin <chengjin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: packet re-ordering on SMP machines. |
| From: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 27 Aug 2002 19:33:03 +0200 |
| Cc: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>, jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Xiaoliang (David) Wei" <weixl@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Cheng Hu <chenghu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Steven Low <slow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx" <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.33L0.0208271011040.27776-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20020827142004.C4358@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.33L0.0208271011040.27776-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.22.1i |
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 10:22:13AM -0700, Cheng Jin wrote: > Hi, Andi, > > > Quick fix is to just use gettimeoffset in netif_rx again. Should > > be fine for you. > > There doesn't appear to be a function called gettimeoffset in 2.4.18 > anymore. The closest I found was do_fast_gettimeoffset in > "arch/i386/kernel/time.c" This appears to be the unlocked version that Yes, I mean do_fast_gettimeoffset. > you are referring to, except I can't tell why the higher 32 bits (edx) of > the timestamp isn't used. (maybe the asm code takes care of it, but it seems > that the result is stored in edx so) 32bit precision are probably enough for this. > > What you said about a light-weight gettime function makes sense. For our > purpose of timing RTTs, any gettime function with a resolution higher than > 1 ms will probably be enough. The time doesn't need to be in exactly in sync > with the one obtained from the locking version of the gettime function. TSC should be fine then. -Andi |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: packet re-ordering on SMP machines., Cheng Jin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: packet re-ordering on SMP machines., Xiaoliang \(David\) Wei |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: packet re-ordering on SMP machines., Cheng Jin |
| Next by Thread: | Re: packet re-ordering on SMP machines., Xiaoliang \(David\) Wei |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |