| To: | Mala Anand <manand@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Lse-tech] Re: (RFC): SKB Initialization |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 27 Aug 2002 11:49:29 -0400 (EDT) |
| Cc: | Bill Hartner <bhartner@xxxxxxxxxx>, <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <OFC842923C.BD15E014-ON87256C22.0047BBD6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Mala Anand wrote: > SPECweb99 profile shows that __kfree_skb is in the top 5 hot routines. We > will test the skb recycle patch on SPECweb99 and add skbinit patch > to that and see how it helps. What I understand is that the skb recycle > patch does not attempt to recycle if the skbs are allocated on CPU > and freed on another CPU. Is that right? If so, skbinit patch will help > those cases. yes it will. Not significant is my current thinking. i.e i wouldnt write my mother to tell her about it. cheers, jamal |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Re: packet re-ordering on SMP machines., Mohd. Mohtashim |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: packet re-ordering on SMP machines., Cheng Jin |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Lse-tech] Re: (RFC): SKB Initialization, Mala Anand |
| Next by Thread: | serious packet loss in 25Mbps load,frame size 64byte,duration 60 second. tested with smartbits, Bergs |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |