| To: | Mala Anand <manand@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Lse-tech] Re: (RFC): SKB Initialization |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 27 Aug 2002 06:17:42 -0400 (EDT) |
| Cc: | <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Bill Hartner <bhartner@xxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <OFFFA46B92.252E5659-ON87256C21.000BB73B@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Mon, 26 Aug 2002, Mala Anand wrote: > Troy Wilson (who works with me) posted SPECweb99 results using my > skbinit patch to lkml on Friday: > http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0208.2/1470.html > I know you don't subscribe to lkml. Have you seen these results? > On Numa machine it showed around 3% improvement using SPECweb99. > The posting you pointed to says 1% - not that it matters. It becomes more insignificant when skb recycling comes in play mostly because the alloc and freeing of skbs doesnt really show up as hotlist item within the profile. I am not saying it is totaly useless -- anything that will save a few cycles is good; cheers, jamal |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Limited Transmit, Naim Far |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: packet re-ordering on SMP machines., jamal |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Lse-tech] Re: (RFC): SKB Initialization, Mala Anand |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Lse-tech] Re: (RFC): SKB Initialization, Mala Anand |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |