On Wed, 14 Aug 2002 kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > What about the known problem with csum_partial called
> > with zero length.
> Maybe it is known to you, but not to me.
Hm, some links:
> > (addr&2!=0 => bug)
> Sorry? What do you mean? Checksumming routines must not have any alignment
> constraints, they used with arbitrary combinations of alignments.
Do you believe, they have :) See the 2nd URL, there is
a fix tested from Wensong (old LVS problem).
Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>