| To: | ja@xxxxxx (Julian Anastasov) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: raw ipv6 broken in 2.4.19 |
| From: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Wed, 14 Aug 2002 02:00:06 +0400 (MSD) |
| Cc: | gandalf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0208140004530.1212-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxx> from "Julian Anastasov" at Aug 14, 2 00:15:09 am |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hello! > What about the known problem with csum_partial called > with zero length. Maybe it is known to you, but not to me. > (addr&2!=0 => bug) Sorry? What do you mean? Checksumming routines must not have any alignment constraints, they used with arbitrary combinations of alignments. Alexey |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: raw ipv6 broken in 2.4.19, Martin Josefsson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: raw ipv6 broken in 2.4.19, Julian Anastasov |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: raw ipv6 broken in 2.4.19, Julian Anastasov |
| Next by Thread: | Re: raw ipv6 broken in 2.4.19, Julian Anastasov |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |