Re: [patch] bug prematurely setting nr

netdev

Re: [patch] bug prematurely setting nr_frags

from [kuznet]

To:	bcrl@xxxxxxxxxx (Benjamin LaHaise)
Subject:	Re: [patch] bug prematurely setting nr_frags
From:	kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date:	Mon, 12 Aug 2002 01:07:33 +0400 (MSD)
Cc:	netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<20020809161439.E10640@xxxxxxxxxx> from "Benjamin LaHaise" at Aug 11, 2 02:45:07 am
Sender:	owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx

Hello!

> that comes from an uninitialized fragment entry in an skb, and this problem 
> looks like a possible causes.

This function is not used, by the way.

Alexey

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[patch] bug prematurely setting nr_frags, Benjamin LaHaise Re: [patch] bug prematurely setting nr_frags, kuznet <= Re: [patch] bug prematurely setting nr_frags, Benjamin LaHaise Re: [patch] bug prematurely setting nr_frags, kuznet Re: [patch] bug prematurely setting nr_frags, Benjamin LaHaise Re: [patch] bug prematurely setting nr_frags, kuznet

Previous by Date:	Re: [PATCH] connect() return value., kuznet
Next by Date:	Re: [PATCH] connect() return value., Geoffrey Lee
Previous by Thread:	[patch] bug prematurely setting nr_frags, Benjamin LaHaise
Next by Thread:	Re: [patch] bug prematurely setting nr_frags, Benjamin LaHaise
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]