| To: | laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Harald Welte) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] Options for ECN target |
| From: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Tue, 6 Aug 2002 17:47:56 +0400 (MSD) |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20020806083541.L11828@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> from "Harald Welte" at Aug 6, 2 12:15:09 pm |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hello! > The first option is necessarry and is the primary use of the target. > The last three options are more experimental and would allow somebody > to play with 'simulated congestion' by setting the ECT in IP, etc. ... > However, this is potentially very dangerous Yes, they are illegal. I would not say "very dangerous". Surely, much less dangerous than cp /dev/zero /dev/mem. :-) So, I think it can be added for debugging purposes, provided hidden in a section devoted to debugging in manual and not shown in command line helper. Alexey |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [RFC] Options for ECN target, Harald Welte |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH] minor socket ioctl cleanup for 2.5.30, James Morris |
| Previous by Thread: | [RFC] Options for ECN target, Harald Welte |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [RFC] Options for ECN target, jamal |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |