[Top] [All Lists]

Re: TODO list before feature freeze

To: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: TODO list before feature freeze
From: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 08:04:42 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: <netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20020729224724.91A3A4B7F@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx

On Tue, 30 Jul 2002, Rusty Russell wrote:

> In message <Pine.GSO.4.30.0207290648020.12604-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> you 
> writ
> e:
> > > Connection tracking:
> >
> > Fix perfomance problems with this thing. You may have seen reports of
> > performance degradation it introduces. I was hoping to take a look at some
> > point time hasnt been visiting this side.
> There are several simple things to do here.  One is to improve the
> hashing (fine for internet traffic, but frequently sucks under LAN
> conditions), which is easy.  The other is to modify the
> one-timer-per-connection approach to a "sweep once a second, or when
> full" approach.

Thats the right direction. From code inspection, fixing the later problem
would give you a lot more punch.

> Both these are simple patches, but I want to see benchmarks showing
> that they improve things.


> Yes, that's exactly the plan.  It'd be more like the old-style
> insert/delete (probably not replace), except with a "commit"
> interface, implemented by copying the rules when they start modifying.

Why not take a look at the way tc does things and emulate that?


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>