| To: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: ICMPv6 ratelimiting, which /proc-settings related? |
| From: | YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 16 Jul 2002 16:30:57 +0900 (JST) |
| In-reply-to: | <14790000.1026803266@localhost> |
| References: | <17380000.1026547066@localhost> <20020715.024401.17983126.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxx> <14790000.1026803266@localhost> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
In article <14790000.1026803266@localhost> (at Tue, 16 Jul 2002 09:07:46 +0200), Peter Bieringer <pb@xxxxxxxxxxxx> says: > > Is introducing /proc/sys/net/ipv6/icmp/all/icmpv6_time reasonable? > > Is HZ completly arch independed? Afair, it was CPU depended (like > grep HZ include/asm/param.h) shows. We already have proc_dointvec_jiffies(). We can use it to make that sysctl be arch independent. > Mho: Better name: > > /proc/sys/net/ipv6/icmp/all/icmpv6_rate > > I would suggest use of unit 1/s and run conversion internally. > Therfore > 1 -> 1/s > 10 -> 10/s > 100 -> 100/s > 0.1 -> 1/10s ah, ipv4 uses /proc/sys/net/ipv4/icmp_*_rate, icmpv6_rate sounds reasonable. --yoshfuji |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: ICMPv6 ratelimiting, which /proc-settings related?, Peter Bieringer |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | business proposal, Svetlana Savitskaya |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: ICMPv6 ratelimiting, which /proc-settings related?, Peter Bieringer |
| Next by Thread: | IPv6-proc-FS neigh/* and route/* information available?, Peter Bieringer |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |