Re: tc lockup on 2.4.19 up

To:	bert hubert <ahu@xxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:	Re: tc lockup on 2.4.19 up
From:	Werner Almesberger <wa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Mon, 8 Jul 2002 18:28:45 -0300
In-reply-to:	<20020708204858.GA16318@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from ahu@xxxxxxx on Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 10:48:58PM +0200
References:	<20020708204858.GA16318@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx

bert hubert wrote:
> I think the rule gets matched circularly, but I'm unsure. 

Indeed. Happens with tcsim too.

I need to think a bit about this one. As a work-around, you can use
tcc with -One, which generates a bunch of tests for equality instead
of the single negation.

Thanks,
- Werner

-- 
  _________________________________________________________________________
 / Werner Almesberger, Buenos Aires, Argentina         wa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx /
/_http://icapeople.epfl.ch/almesber/_____________________________________/

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
tc lockup on 2.4.19 up, bert hubert Re: tc lockup on 2.4.19 up, Werner Almesberger <=

Previous by Date:	Re: IPv6 ND on PPC hardware, kuznet
Next by Date:	tc lockup on 2.4.19 up, bert hubert
Previous by Thread:	tc lockup on 2.4.19 up, bert hubert
Next by Thread:	An answer for "Scheduling in interrupt"., Tong Lee
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]