netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Network oops

To: george@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Network oops
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 07:17:20 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ak@xxxxxx, pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx, andrew.r.cress@xxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <3D133538.60B6810C@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <3D120EAE.5A0D365E@xxxxxxxxxx> <20020620.173805.55219901.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <3D133538.60B6810C@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
   From: george anzinger <george@xxxxxxxxxx>
   Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 07:16:24 -0700

[ BTW please start using newlines in your emails, instead of 1,000
  character monstrosities lacking them.  Thanks ]

   On the other hand, I prefer to think of the linux community as a
   group of folks working on making one of the best OSs on the planet
   even better.

Right, and I don't think CONFIG_PREEMPT makes the planet better.
In fact, now that you mention it, I think CONFIG_PREEMPT is a pile
of crap.

   > It requires a full audit of the networking in the new preemption
   > environment.
   
   Any pointers on what to look for would be welcome.

And you go right back to asking me to do the work for you.
What is wrong with you?

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>