| To: | Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] SNMP_ADD_STATS |
| From: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 13 Jun 2002 02:11:19 +0200 |
| Cc: | "David S.Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20020612182348.GP1073@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20020612182348.GP1073@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.22.1i |
> #define IP_ADD_STATS(field,incr) SNMP_ADD_STATS(ip_statistics, field, incr) > > Any objections? Better use per_cpu data in 2.5 (<asm/percpu.h>) for the MIBs. That's much more efficient on some architectures, uses less memory on all and is also cleaner. -Andi |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: NAPI for eepro100, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: NAPI for eepro100, Donald Becker |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [RFC] SNMP_ADD_STATS, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: NAPI for eepro100, Jeff Garzik |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |