| To: | davidsen@xxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: RFC: per-socket statistics on received/dropped packets |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 11 Jun 2002 20:41:19 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, cfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.3.96.1020611183218.29598A-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20020609.213440.04716391.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.3.96.1020611183218.29598A-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 18:41:16 -0400 (EDT)
Actually your arguments sound like you have a solution to your problem
and you want everyone to use it even if it doesn't help them. Have you
some emotional tie to SNMP, like being an author?
After a comment like this, I have no interest in listening to anything
else you have to say. I've been maintaining the Linux networking for
5 or more years now, and the most important thing I do is say no to
changes.
Franks a lot,
David S. Miller
davem@xxxxxxxxxx
|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Network oops, Donald Becker |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: RFC: per-socket statistics on received/dropped packets, Richard Guy Briggs |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: RFC: per-socket statistics on received/dropped packets, Bill Davidsen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: RFC: per-socket statistics on received/dropped packets, Richard Guy Briggs |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |