"David S. Miller" wrote:
>
> Also we need to know what network driver, if preemption is being
> used (being from mvista I assume you are using preemption, and if
> so make sure you have the preemption networking patches applied).
Uh, are you saying there is a set of network patches? If
so, where might they be found? And yes, we are testing
preemption, trying to wring out the "last" bug :) (Could
you be referring to the patches we are developing?)
The driver (from the system log):
<4>eepro100.c:v1.09j-t 9/29/99 Donald Becker
http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/drivers/eepro100.html
<4>eepro100.c: $Revision: 1.36 $ 2000/11/17 Modified by
Andrey V. Savochkin <saw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> and others
<6>eth0: OEM i82557/i82558 10/100 Ethernet,
00:03:47:BD:60:86, IRQ 21.
<6> Board assembly fab600-000, Physical connectors
present: RJ45
<6> Primary interface chip i82555 PHY #1.
<6> General self-test: passed.
<6> Serial sub-system self-test: passed.
<6> Internal registers self-test: passed.
<6> ROM checksum self-test: passed (0xb874c1d3).
<6>eth1: OEM i82557/i82558 10/100 Ethernet,
00:03:47:BD:60:87, IRQ 20.
<6> Board assembly fab600-000, Physical connectors
present: RJ45
<6> Primary interface chip i82555 PHY #1.
<6> General self-test: passed.
<6> Serial sub-system self-test: passed.
<6> Internal registers self-test: passed.
<6> ROM checksum self-test: passed (0xb874c1d3).
Looks like two NICs.
--
George Anzinger george@xxxxxxxxxx
High-res-timers:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-res-timers/
Real time sched: http://sourceforge.net/projects/rtsched/
Preemption patch:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rml
|