| To: | greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: RFC: per-socket statistics on received/dropped packets |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 08 Jun 2002 17:51:08 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, cfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <3D029DAF.5040006@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20020608170511.B26821@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20020608.160407.101346167.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <3D029DAF.5040006@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
From: Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 08 Jun 2002 17:13:35 -0700 If you're talking per-socket SNMP counters, then that could work. General protocol-wide counters would not help much, at least in my case. Why not? If you know where the drops are occurring, what else do you need to know? I'm not talking about per-socket SNMP counters, that would be rediclious. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: RFC: per-socket statistics on received/dropped packets, Ben Greear |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: RFC: per-socket statistics on received/dropped packets, Pekka Pietikäinen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: RFC: per-socket statistics on received/dropped packets, Ben Greear |
| Next by Thread: | Re: RFC: per-socket statistics on received/dropped packets, Ben Greear |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |