netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: ipv4.o module

from [Matti Aarnio] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: ipv4.o module
From: Matti Aarnio <matti.aarnio@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 23:46:15 +0200
Cc: Matti Aarnio <matti.aarnio@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Pine.GSO.4.30.0203111308350.26431-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from hadi@xxxxxxxxxx on Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 01:12:17PM -0500
References: <20020310042603.H10704@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.GSO.4.30.0203111308350.26431-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx 
On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 01:12:17PM -0500, jamal wrote:
> Folks,
> 
> Have you thought of the pandora box this opens?

  Nothing new.

> Imagine someone running a BSD IP module to replace the
> Linux one (and of course many proprietary others).
> The question is more philosophical than technical:
>   Is this a Good Thing(tm)?

 You can do that already.  You just DON'T define  CONFIG_INET,
 and you will have room for plugging in your own IPv4 stack.

> cheers,
> jamal

/Matti Aarnio
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: ipv4.o module, Francois Romieu
Next by Date:  What is wrong here?????, Hossain, Mohammad
Previous by Thread:  Re: ipv4.o module, Francois Romieu
Next by Thread:  modular IPv4, Boris Bezlaj
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]