[Top] [All Lists]

Re: addrconf.c - possible bug

To: pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: addrconf.c - possible bug
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 04:04:58 +0900
Cc: xs26-dev@xxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0203081627570.8718-200000@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20020308131131.GR2198@xxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0203081627570.8718-200000@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In article <Pine.LNX.4.44.0203081627570.8718-200000@xxxxxxxxxx> (at Fri, 8 Mar 
2002 16:32:55 +0200 (EET)), Pekka Savola <pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx> says:

> differently: DAD starts from number X (X>0) decrementing it and RS start 
> from (assumed to be zero), incrementing it.

Sending RSs only when DAD for link-local addresses has been completed on
non-loopback interfaces, and addrconf_dad_completed() set ifp->probes 1.
It sets addrconf_mod_timer() and addrconf_rs_timer() will resend
RSs ifp->idev->cnf.rtr_solicits - 1 times.  

RS and DAD are not sent at the same time.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>