| To: | pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx (Pekka Savola) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: addrconf.c - possible bug |
| From: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Sat, 9 Mar 2002 21:03:42 +0300 (MSK) |
| Cc: | xs26-dev@xxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0203081627570.8718-200000@xxxxxxxxxx> from "Pekka Savola" at Mar 8, 2 04:32:55 pm |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hello! > A problem seems to be is that ifp->probes has been overloaded for both > RS's and NS's (rtr solicits and DAD basically), It is not overload, DAD and RS are part of one process; RS follows DAD. > So there _appears_ to be a possible race there. ifp state machine is serialized with spinlock. However it does not matter: Pekka, please, reread the report; they talk about _neigbour_ _solicitations_. They have nothing to do either with ifp->probes, RS, DA or with addrconf.c at all. It is deal of ndisc.c/neghbour.c. Well, they insist that ndisc does work at all. :-) Alexey |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: modular IPv4, Francois Romieu |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: addrconf.c - possible bug, Pekka Savola |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: addrconf.c - possible bug, Pekka Savola |
| Next by Thread: | Re: addrconf.c - possible bug, Pekka Savola |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |