| To: | Chris Friesen <cfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: raw sockets, IP_HDRINCL, and fragmentation |
| From: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 7 Mar 2002 19:16:45 +0100 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <3C87AD05.F9BC8457@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from cfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 01:10:13PM -0500 |
| References: | <3C87AD05.F9BC8457@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 01:10:13PM -0500, Chris Friesen wrote: > > Just a quick question before I try some prototyping. If I have a raw socket > and > set IP_HDRINCL, then send out an IP packet larger than the underlying physical > layer can handle (say 2KB packets over ethernet) will the ip stack fragment > the > packet for me? They are not, as documented in raw(7) -Andi |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: raw sockets, IP_HDRINCL, and fragmentation, Hossain, Mohammad |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: raw sockets, IP_HDRINCL, and fragmentation, Chris Friesen |
| Previous by Thread: | raw sockets, IP_HDRINCL, and fragmentation, Chris Friesen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: raw sockets, IP_HDRINCL, and fragmentation, Chris Friesen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |