netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [PATCH] Restore ROUTE MASQ in 2.4

from [kuznet] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: ja@xxxxxx (Julian Anastasov)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Restore ROUTE MASQ in 2.4
From: kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 22:26:11 +0300 (MSK)
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, netfilter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ja@xxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0201252058080.20968-100000@l> from "Julian Anastasov" at Jan 25, 2 09:11:30 pm
Sender: owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx 
Hello!

> multipath route has distinct paths but the lsrc solves this problem,

What's about fwmark? Why it does not help?


>                       Routers NAT-ing through different ISPs are
> a good thing to support. 

I understand this, of course.

Alexey
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [PATCH] Restore ROUTE MASQ in 2.4, Julian Anastasov
Next by Date:  Re: [PATCH] Restore ROUTE MASQ in 2.4, Julian Anastasov
Previous by Thread:  Re: [PATCH] Restore ROUTE MASQ in 2.4, Julian Anastasov
Next by Thread:  Re: [PATCH] Restore ROUTE MASQ in 2.4, Julian Anastasov
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]