| To: | davem@xxxxxxxxxx (David S. Miller) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: netdev.stats change suggestion |
| From: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Thu, 24 Jan 2002 23:33:56 +0300 (MSK) |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20020124.062650.66057933.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> from "David S. Miller" at Jan 24, 2 05:45:01 pm |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hello! > I have no problems with it, I have. 64bit counters create lots of troubles. Particularly, all the reads must be serialized wrt writes. And I really do not see _any_ legal reasons to hold this kind of statistics in the kernel. I would even prefer that 64bit architectures used not "unsigned long" but u32. In fact, all that is required of statistics is to grow monotonically. If it does, user level is more than happy. Look into iproute2, for example for ifstat, nstat and rtacct. Alexey |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Restore ROUTE MASQ in 2.4, kuznet |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: netdev.stats change suggestion, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: netdev.stats change suggestion, Robert Olsson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: netdev.stats change suggestion, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |