| To: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] make rt_intern_hash() don't search yet another time on UP |
| From: | Martin Josefsson <gandalf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 19 Jan 2002 20:55:18 +0100 (CET) |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200201191922.WAA32142@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Sat, 19 Jan 2002 kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Hello! Hi, > > rt_intern_hash() isn't needed on UP AFAIK. > > Did you notice that route_slow works with enabled softirqs? Hmm can you explain this in more detail please? I didn't think a new softirq that was scheduled by a interrupthandler could "preempt" a running softirq if that's what you mean. I certainly see why that extra lookup is needed on SMP but I can't really see why it's needed on UP. > > - rthp = &rt_hash_table[hash].chain; > > It is not dereference. Gah, you are correct. (I think I need some coffee :) /Martin Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: gred_dump (2.4.17): bad semantic and memory leak, kuznet |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: gred_dump (2.4.17): bad semantic and memory leak, jamal |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] make rt_intern_hash() don't search yet another time on UP, kuznet |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] make rt_intern_hash() don't search yet another time on UP, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |