| To: | acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH][RFC 3] cleaning up struct sock |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 20 Dec 2001 00:21:26 -0800 (PST) |
| Cc: | SteveW@xxxxxxx, jschlst@xxxxxxxxx, ncorbic@xxxxxxxxxxx, eis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, dag@xxxxxxxxxxx, torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, marcelo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20011220012339.A919@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20011218.130809.22018359.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <20011218232222.A1963@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20011220012339.A919@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 01:23:39 -0200 Available at: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/acme/v2.5/2.5.1/ sock.cleanup-2.5.1.patch.bz2 Looking pretty good. I have one improvement. I'd rather you pass the "kmem_cache_t" directly into sk_alloc, use NULL for "I don't have any extra private area". And then, for the IP case lay it out like this: struct sock struct ip_opt struct {tcp,raw4,...}_opt And use different kmem_cache_t's for each protocol instead of the same one for tcp, raw4, etc. RAW/UDP sockets waste a lot of space with your current layout. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH][RFC 3] cleaning up struct sock, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] make netfilter able to change/see skb->priority, Harald Welte |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH][RFC 3] cleaning up struct sock, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH][RFC 3] cleaning up struct sock, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |