| To: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx (jamal) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: CBQ and all other qdiscs now REALLY completely documented |
| From: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Mon, 10 Dec 2001 20:04:16 +0300 (MSK) |
| Cc: | ahu@xxxxxxx, lartc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.GSO.4.30.0112091642480.6079-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> from "jamal" at Dec 9, 1 04:45:01 pm |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hello! > So priority limits the size of skb->priority to be from 0..6; this wont > work with that check in cbq. No, it does not. Values different of "low prio" defaults (0..6) are not allowed to user without privileges by evident reasons. User with correspoding capability may direct traffic to any class. Alexey |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: CBQ MANPAGE: I hear the theme of '2001, A Space Odyssey', bert hubert |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Design] Re: what pointers does pskb_may_pull() nuke?, Michael Richardson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: CBQ and all other qdiscs now REALLY completely documented, jamal |
| Next by Thread: | CBQ MANPAGE: I hear the theme of '2001, A Space Odyssey', bert hubert |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |