| To: | bert hubert <ahu@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: CBQ and all other qdiscs now REALLY completely documented |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 9 Dec 2001 19:58:40 -0500 (EST) |
| Cc: | <kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20011209231340.A23420@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Sun, 9 Dec 2001, bert hubert wrote: > On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 05:07:03PM -0500, jamal wrote: > > > > So priority limits the size of skb->priority to be from 0..6; this wont > > > > work with that check in cbq. > > > > > > No, only IP_TOS does so. > > > > probaly ip precedence. Have you tried this or you are following what the > > man pages say? > > I have been living in the source for quite a while now - see ip_setsockopt() > in net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c. > Thats the wrong place to look. Look instead at: net/core/sock.c I got it; non root is limited to 0..6; root can set the full 32 bit range. cheers, jamal |
| Previous by Date: | CBQ MANPAGE: I hear the theme of '2001, A Space Odyssey', bert hubert |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: CBQ MANPAGE: I hear the theme of '2001, A Space Odyssey', jamal |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: CBQ and all other qdiscs now REALLY completely documented, bert hubert |
| Next by Thread: | Re: CBQ and all other qdiscs now REALLY completely documented, kuznet |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |