| To: | KUSUNOKI Masanori <masanori@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Hi~ I have stupid question. :) |
| From: | Matti Aarnio <matti.aarnio@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 22 Nov 2001 18:25:32 +0200 |
| Cc: | Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Sung-jae. Lee." <kernelman@xxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <98FF371E-DF5F-11D5-8149-00039358A8E2@xxxxxxxxxxx>; from masanori@xxxxxxxxxxx on Fri, Nov 23, 2001 at 12:42:55AM +0900 |
| References: | <20011122132701.B1005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <98FF371E-DF5F-11D5-8149-00039358A8E2@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Fri, Nov 23, 2001 at 12:42:55AM +0900, KUSUNOKI Masanori wrote: > You can't unload IPv6 module. > This is specification. > # Few years ago, you can unload ipv6 module, > # but kernel will freeze B-p I could unload at one point, but it really isn't worth the effort. Doing that is fairly easy -- took me a week at one point, but the real effort which I see interesting is to have IPv6-only stack without IPv4 in kernel at all. Developing that is -- likely a bit more of a challenge. There are: - IPv4 specific stuff - IPv6 specific stuff - generic TCP and UDP stuff Presently both the IPv4 specific, and generic TCP and UDP are in the IPv4 part. /Matti Aarnio |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Hi~ I have stupid question. :), KUSUNOKI Masanori |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Hi~ I have stupid question. :), Sung-jae. Lee. |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Hi~ I have stupid question. :), KUSUNOKI Masanori |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Hi~ I have stupid question. :), Sung-jae. Lee. |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |