| To: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Turning off CRC check in NIC |
| From: | chuckw@xxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Tue, 13 Nov 2001 21:28:05 -0500 |
| In-reply-to: | <20011110134559.A19083@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from ctor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 01:45:59PM +0100 |
| Mail-followup-to: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <20011110134559.A19083@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 01:45:59PM +0100, Carl-Johan Bostorp wrote: > Hello, > > I want to turn off the CRC check on ethernet frames and pass every packet up > to the kernel. I have an eepro100, so I mailed Intel about it and asked for > specs. The reply I got was that the kernel may actually rely on the NIC doing > this check. > > So, what's the deal? What effects will there be if the NIC starts passing > everything up to the kernel? > > > -- > ~~~<*>~~~ > > Web: http://elemental.webservices.se/ ICQ: 3534707 > PGP: 0xA6B5C43B IRCnet: ctor > > ~~~<*>~~~ I would think there would be many problems with this. One being that the protocol field may be mangled, then the kernel wouldn't know what to do with the packet. Chuck |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | dst_entry & rtable in 2.2.12, chuckw |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Turning off CRC check in NIC, Ben Greear |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Turning off CRC check in NIC, Carl-Johan Bostorp |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Turning off CRC check in NIC, Ben Greear |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |