| To: | pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: IPv6 src address selection rules and 2.2.19 |
| From: | YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 06 Nov 2001 18:57:06 +0900 |
| Cc: | mcr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.33.0111060945570.24198-100000@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <200111060339.fA63d6j01897@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.33.0111060945570.24198-100000@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
In article <Pine.LNX.4.33.0111060945570.24198-100000@xxxxxxxxxx> (at Tue, 6 Nov
2001 09:50:26 +0200 (EET)), Pekka Savola <pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx> says:
> The same problems as with 2.4; source address selection is .. very simple,
> one could say. USAGI have implemented new RFC-candidate src address
> selection rules from KAME, and those will hopefully be merged to
> mainstream at some point; I view this as rather important (one reason is
> because 3ffe/2001 vs 2002 selection does not work, which could optimize
> traffic enermously in some cases :-)
Our implimentation done by ourselves (me...); not from KAME.
Anyway, we have a plan to merge our improvements included in our next
stable release, inclding the "double bind" feature and source address
selection algorithms.
Note: we need further enhancements for the source address selection;
policy label is needed.
--yoshfuji
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: IPv6 src address selection rules and 2.2.19, Pekka Savola |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: IPv6 src address selection rules and 2.2.19, Michael Richardson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: IPv6 src address selection rules and 2.2.19, Pekka Savola |
| Next by Thread: | Re: IPv6 src address selection rules and 2.2.19, Michael Richardson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |