| To: | mkprice@xxxxxxxxxx (Mark Price) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: patch - SNMP Kernel Counters |
| From: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Fri, 5 Oct 2001 22:37:03 +0400 (MSK DST) |
| Cc: | mkprice@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.33.0110051057140.2037-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> from "Mark Price" at Oct 5, 1 11:05:06 am |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hello! > The reason I did not increment this counter in the "drop:" label is that > the counter should not be incremented on all drops. The description of > IpInDiscards is: I see. Indeed. > So I only increment in two places, once when skb_cow() fails, and once > when skb_share_check() fails. Well, make another label sort of "drop_and_account", "drop_with_acct" :-) Invent good name. :-) Alexey |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: patch - SNMP Kernel Counters, Mark Price |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [announce] [patch] limiting IRQ load, irq-rewrite-2.4.11-B5, Andreas Dilger |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: patch - SNMP Kernel Counters, Mark Price |
| Next by Thread: | Some NAPI results, jamal |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |