| To: | mingo@xxxxxxx, jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [announce] [patch] limiting IRQ load, irq-rewrite-2.4.11-B5 |
| From: | Alex Bligh - linux-kernel <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 04 Oct 2001 22:28:17 +0100 |
| Cc: | linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@xxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Simon Kirby <sim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Alex Bligh - linux-kernel <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.33.0110031528370.6272-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.33.0110031528370.6272-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | Alex Bligh - linux-kernel <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
--On Wednesday, 03 October, 2001 4:51 PM +0200 Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote: your refusal to accept this problem as an existing and real problem is really puzzling me. In at least one environment known to me (router), I'd rather it kept accepting packets, and f/w'ing them, and didn't switch VTs etc. By dropping down performance, you've made the DoS attack even more successful than it would otherwise have been (the kiddie looks at effect on the host at the end). -- Alex Bligh |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [announce] [patch] limiting IRQ load, irq-rewrite-2.4.11-B5, Alex Bligh - linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [announce] [patch] limiting IRQ load, irq-rewrite-2.4.11-B5, Benjamin LaHaise |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [announce] [patch] limiting IRQ load, irq-rewrite-2.4.11-B5, jamal |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [announce] [patch] limiting IRQ load, irq-rewrite-2.4.11-B5, Benjamin LaHaise |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |