jamal wrote:
>
> Now if we can cut that second column to all 0s we are set ;->
>
> cheers,
> jamal
>
> On Thu, 4 Oct 2001, Robert Olsson wrote:
>
> >
> > Correct!
> >
> > We were interested to see the the packet distribution on the different CPU's
> > with this scheme. Reality had data we couldn't get in the lab. Seems there
> > is nothing to complain about. Yet. I'd better say. :-)
> >
> > cat /proc/net/softnet_stat
> > 2b85c320 0000d374 6524ce48 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
> > 0007119d
> > 2b8b5e29 0000d615 653eba32 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
> > 00072f44
> >
> > First col: pkts
> > Second col: drops
> > Third col: time_squeeze (by the polling loop)
> > Last col: cpu_collsions (TX)
So you're priting out counters in HEX?? This seems one place where a nice
base-10 number would be appropriate :)
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Ben_Greear AT excite.com>
President of Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
ScryMUD: http://scry.wanfear.com http://scry.wanfear.com/~greear
|