netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [patch] netconsole-2.4.10-B1

To: <mingo@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [patch] netconsole-2.4.10-B1
From: Richard Gooch <rgooch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2001 10:28:24 -0600
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Kenneth Johansson <ken@xxxxxxxx>, "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>, Andreas Dilger <adilger@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0110010924380.3436-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <200109301225.f8UCPXl16936@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.33.0110010924380.3436-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Ingo Molnar writes:
[Much rationalising deleted:-]
> but telling any side to be wrong is stupid - both are correct, and
> the correct meaning of 'server' depends alot on context. this is why
> i defined the terms.

Hey! I didn't call anyone stupid. I didn't even call the idea
stupid. I think your terminology is backwards to the way I think and
what seems to be accepted practice (and I notice I'm not alone in
that).

However, "he who writes the code gets to choose", and I'd be a
hypocrite to say otherwise :-) I was just hoping to change your mind.

                                Regards,

                                        Richard....
Permanent: rgooch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Current:   rgooch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>