Re: Simple Packet Signing

[bert hubert <ahu@xxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 12:20:22PM -0400, Ethan Blanton wrote:

> It goes a bit further even than what you are proposing (allowing
> complete substitution of crypotgraphic ID for the host IP in most
> circumstances), but it is a *very* good idea.  I'm not sure I agree
> with all the details at this stage, but the WG hasn't even been formed
> yet, so there is a long way to go.  :-)

Looks somewhat interesting, though still pretty complex. SPS is very much a
'now' thing, but perhaps the HIP people can learn from the mistakes we will
obviously make.

Thanks for pointing me to this - it has already been useful reading their
ideas.

Regards,

bert