Re: ip_input.c / time measurements

["Nivedita Singhvi" <nivedita@xxxxxxxxxx>]

>>thought of ip_rcv(), where incidentally iph = skb->nh.iph; is performed
twice
>>(unnecessarily?), and ip_local_deliver_finish().

>There is a reason for the duplicate iph = skb->nh.iph;
>skb might have changed after the call to skb_share_check().

Er, youre right, in that the initialization where its declared
isnt necessary.

thanks,
Nivedita