| To: | ralf@xxxxxxxxxxx (Ralf Baechle) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Bad performance when using IPv4 and IPv6 together |
| From: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Thu, 16 Aug 2001 21:24:08 +0400 (MSK DST) |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20010815232753.A14025@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> from "Ralf Baechle" at Aug 16, 1 01:45:07 am |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hello! > Have you only tested ICMP using ping? I was observing odd behaviour of > ping6 also but suspect it's actually ping6. So for example ping6 behaves > different for me depending if I give it a hostname or an IP address - > even though both refer to the same address of a local interface. DNS. Reversed resolutions for IPv6 are _damnly_ slow. By default ping6 from iputils disables reversed resolution, when you give numeric address. No matter: net results obtained with ping/ping6 from iputils do not depend on (mis)configuration of DNS. It may delay waiting for DNS, but the results for latency are right anyway. Alexey |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Bad performance when using IPv4 and IPv6 together, Ralf Baechle |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: disabling tcp quickacks, Alexey Kuznetsov |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Bad performance when using IPv4 and IPv6 together, Ralf Baechle |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Bad performance when using IPv4 and IPv6 together, Brad Chapman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |