[Top] [All Lists]

Re: IPv6 fragmentation and IPv6 header parsing

To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: IPv6 fragmentation and IPv6 header parsing
From: Michael Richardson <mcr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2001 13:14:53 -0400
Cc: Brad Chapman <kakadu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 02 Aug 2001 13:38:39 +0200." <20010802133839.C24305@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> "Ralf" == Ralf Baechle <ralf@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
    Ralf> On Thu, Aug 02, 2001 at 11:07:58AM +0530, Imran Patel wrote:

    >> On the contrary, it might be useful for transition from IPv4 to IPv6
    >> ;-) IPv6 connection tracking is useful for NAT-PT. However, other
    >> options on top of IPv6 conntrack like masquerading, v6-v6 NAT, etc
    >> look useless and silly.

    Ralf> You forget real world.  I bet ISPs will continue to only give a

  You forget 6to4. 
  One IPv4 address gets you 2^80 IPv6 addresses.

]       ON HUMILITY: to err is human. To moo, bovine.           |  firewalls  [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON    |net architect[
] mcr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |device driver[
] panic("Just another NetBSD/notebook using, kernel hacking, security guy");  [

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>