| To: | kakadu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Brad Chapman) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: IPv6 fragmentation and IPv6 header parsing |
| From: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Wed, 1 Aug 2001 22:20:42 +0400 (MSK DST) |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <3B6838AD.6010402@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> from "Brad Chapman" at Aug 1, 1 01:13:17 pm |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hello! > answer on the question of why it would need on-the-fly fragmenting: 1.) > to make > it's life easier when tracking layer-3/4 headers and messing with packet > data (in > NAT, but that's not important anymore) You confirmed yourself that it is meaningless purpose. > and 2.) in case the idiot on the > other > end won't allow an MTU of 1500 ;-) This just sounds as full non-sense to me. What is special with 1500? Alexey |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: IPv6 fragmentation and IPv6 header parsing, Brad Chapman |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: IPv6 fragmentation and IPv6 header parsing, Brad Chapman |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: IPv6 fragmentation and IPv6 header parsing, Brad Chapman |
| Next by Thread: | Re: IPv6 fragmentation and IPv6 header parsing, Brad Chapman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |