| To: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: missing icmp errors for udp packets |
| From: | Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 1 Aug 2001 07:34:41 +1200 |
| Cc: | therapy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200107311925.XAA11038@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing |
| References: | <200107311925.XAA11038@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.18i |
On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 11:25:50PM +0400, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Anyway, it is clear that echos are to be limited differently of
errors.
Even then I wonder if it is worth the code. If you are rate-limiting,
who cares if drop the odd echo/reply?
ICMP echo/reply is a useful diagnostic tool --- but on the internet as
we have it today, its limitations need to be understood by the user :)
--cw
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: missing icmp errors for udp packets, Chris Wedgwood |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: missing icmp errors for udp packets, Chris Wedgwood |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: missing icmp errors for udp packets, Chris Wedgwood |
| Next by Thread: | Re: missing icmp errors for udp packets, Chris Wedgwood |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |