netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: missing icmp errors for udp packets

from [kuznet] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: cw@xxxxxxxx (Chris Wedgwood)
Subject: Re: missing icmp errors for udp packets
From: kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 23:25:50 +0400 (MSK DST)
Cc: therapy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20010801072347.C8228@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> from "Chris Wedgwood" at Aug 1, 1 07:23:47 am
Sender: owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx 
Hello!

> Why do we do this anyhow?

I have no idea. This is too old facility to be remembered.

Anyway, it is clear that echos are to be limited differently of errors.

Alexey
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: missing icmp errors for udp packets, Chris Wedgwood
Next by Date:  Re: ping bug, kuznet
Previous by Thread:  Re: missing icmp errors for udp packets, Chris Wedgwood
Next by Thread:  Re: missing icmp errors for udp packets, Chris Wedgwood
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]