| To: | pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx (Pekka Savola) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: missing icmp errors for udp packets |
| From: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Tue, 31 Jul 2001 23:17:55 +0400 (MSK DST) |
| Cc: | therapy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxx (Dave Miller), ak@xxxxxx (Andi Kleen) |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.33.0107312207040.20518-100000@xxxxxxxxxx> from "Pekka Savola" at Jul 31, 1 10:12:12 pm |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hello! > What I meant (to say) is, for people who _want_ to limit pings too, CBQ can do this in any way, which is possible to imagine. In any case, I need to get some verdict from Andi and Dave to move in either way. [ For Dave and Andi: should I resume the problem? ] Alexey |
| Previous by Date: | Re: ping bug, kuznet |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: ping bug, Chris Wedgwood |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: missing icmp errors for udp packets, Pekka Savola |
| Next by Thread: | Re: missing icmp errors for udp packets, Chris Wedgwood |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |