| To: | Pekka Savola <pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: missing icmp errors for udp packets |
| From: | clemens <therapy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 29 Jul 2001 13:16:15 +0200 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.33.0107290739370.2081-100000@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.33.0107290739370.2081-100000@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.18i |
On Sun, Jul 29, 2001 at 07:57:48AM +0300, Pekka Savola wrote: > HOWEVER, I noticed that 'nmap -P0' (ie. don't ping first) always works > without problems! probably there is a bug in the icmp reply throttling code? without pinging first, there are icmp replies. with pinging first, there are no icmp replies. with pinging and heavy udp scanning, there are a few (throttled) icmp replies. (try yourself) seems like the icmpsendingrate isn't resetted below the threshold properly? clemens p.s.: does this somehow explain why this whole issue doesn't apply to the loopback devices? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: missing icmp errors for udp packets, Pekka Savola |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: missing icmp errors for udp packets, Pekka Savola |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: missing icmp errors for udp packets, Pekka Savola |
| Next by Thread: | Re: missing icmp errors for udp packets, Pekka Savola |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |