| To: | Maillist netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: IPv6+2.4.x: ipv6_local_port_range implementation plans + netfilter6 |
| From: | Peter Bieringer <pb@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 05 Jun 2001 20:06:12 +0200 |
| Cc: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20010603132942.A2582@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
--On Sunday, June 03, 2001 01:29:42 PM +0200 Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx>
wrote:
On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 11:03:24AM +0200, Peter Bieringer wrote:Hi all, are there any plans to implement "ipv6_local_port_range" in the future like on IPv4?The IPv4 sysctl is shared between IPv4 and IPv6, because v4 and v6 share a common port space. Thanks for reply. Two more questions:1) exists there any documentation beside the source code itself which "/proc/sys/net/ipv4" values will be also used for IPv6? 2) are there any plans for 2.5 or later to split off common used proc switches to another directory like "/proc/sys/net/ip"? There was a thread sometimes ago relating 'howto make IPv4 as module' which can be take advantage of such split off (I'm thinking about IPv6 only clients with Linux network stack)... TIA, Peter |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Where can i find 4.x BSD Source Code, sndtrn27 |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | arp cache issue, Snyder, Ryan |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: IPv6+2.4.x: ipv6_local_port_range implementation plans + netfilter6, Andi Kleen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: IPv6+2.4.x: ipv6_local_port_range implementation plans + netfilter6, Andi Kleen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |