| To: | sébastien person <sebastien.person@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: NEWBEE "reverse ioctl" or someting like |
| From: | Markus Schaber <markus.schaber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 4 May 2001 00:34:18 +0200 (MEST) |
| Cc: | liste noyau linux <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, liste dev network device <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20010503142929.773147bf.sebastien.person@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hello, On Thu, 3 May 2001, sébastien person wrote: > I think that use of pipe isn't preconised because I must fork process > to use pipe, I search something like ioctl but in the other way : > > kernel process ---> user process What about using /proc/ ? Gruß, Markus -- | Gluecklich ist, wer vergisst, was nicht aus ihm geworden ist. +---------------------------------------. ,----------------> http://www.uni-ulm.de/~s_mschab/ \ / mailto:markus.schaber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx \_/ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: [BUG] freeze Alpha ES40 SMP 2.4.4.ac3, another TCP/IP Problem ? ( was 2.4.4 kernel crash , possibly tcp related ), Cabaniols, Sebastien |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: NETDEV_CHANGE events when __LINK_STATE_NOCARRIER is modified, Janice Girouard |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: NEWBEE "reverse ioctl" or someting like, volodya |
| Next by Thread: | IPv6: NS -> NA reply RFC2461 SHOULD considerations [patch], Pekka Savola |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |