| To: | mostrows@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: TCP sockets not flagged as writable? |
| From: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Tue, 13 Mar 2001 21:54:41 +0300 (MSK) |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <15022.25987.855027.503534@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> from "Michal Ostrowski" at Mar 13, 1 01:22:59 pm |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hello! > But my concern is that when you have just a little bit of space > available a write operation may succeed without blocking, even though > poll() says it won't. Moreover, write() can succeed even if there is no space _really_. > Should tcp_sendmsg() not also rely on the 1/3 free requirement? Which is fully equavalent to decreasing sndbuf by 1/3. 8) Wake is delayed exaclty to batch work. Alexey |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: TCP sockets not flagged as writable?, Michal Ostrowski |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: TCP sockets not flagged as writable?, Dancer |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: TCP sockets not flagged as writable?, Michal Ostrowski |
| Next by Thread: | Re: TCP sockets not flagged as writable?, Dancer |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |