| To: | pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx (Pekka Savola) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: weird implementation of ipip and sit tunnels |
| From: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Sun, 11 Mar 2001 20:41:42 +0300 (MSK) |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.31.0103111307380.29240-200000@xxxxxxxxxx> from "Pekka Savola" at Mar 11, 1 01:13:57 pm |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hello! > It seems you can only add point-to-point tunnels. and > In short: with 'ip tunnel', traceroute6 seems to set TTL to IPv4 packet > header too, not only IPv6. Sigh, it is that rare case when I wrote pretty detailed manual, occasionally answering these questions in bold. 8) Alexey |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] RFC: fix ethernet device initialization, Jeff Garzik |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: PROBLEM: a local TCP socket close does not trigger a poll on the other end, kuznet |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: weird implementation of ipip and sit tunnels, Pekka Savola |
| Next by Thread: | Re: weird implementation of ipip and sit tunnels, Pekka Savola |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |