Re: weird implementation of ipip and sit tunnels

[Pekka Savola <pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sun, 4 Mar 2001 kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >                                                       Or didn't
> > anybody really need this so much as to spend time for doing it "right" ?
>
> The time has been spent several years ago. Keyword is "ip tunnel".

It seems you can only add point-to-point tunnels.  I might want to add
equivalents of /30 too.  You can do this (in the limited fashion, as
described earlier) with ifconfig.

Is there a reason why only P-t-P tunnels can be used with 'ip tunnel' ?

-- 
Pekka Savola                  "Tell me of difficulties surmounted,
Netcore Oy                    not those you stumble over and fall"
Systems. Networks. Security.   -- Robert Jordan: A Crown of Swords