| To: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx (jamal) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Fwd: Re: possible bug x86 2.4.2 SMP in IP receive stack] |
| From: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Fri, 9 Mar 2001 21:01:28 +0300 (MSK) |
| Cc: | ak@xxxxxx, feldy@xxxxxxxx, andrewm@xxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, pp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.GSO.4.30.0103090903440.6867-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> from "jamal" at Mar 9, 1 09:13:16 am |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hello! > Bob, One of the things that could be done is have the driver stop sending > packets after the toplayer gets congested (return is NET_RX_CN_HIGH). > linux/include/linux/netdevice.h has the NET_RX_* which are returned > by netif_rx() Bulk jumbo transfers at giga rates is one of the cases, when the engine should and can be tuned to _never_ slowdown or to drop in backlog. We do not make any work at BHs, data is not accessed. It must fly. Alexey |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Fwd: Re: possible bug x86 2.4.2 SMP in IP receive stack], jamal |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Fwd: Re: possible bug x86 2.4.2 SMP in IP receive stack], Bob Felderman |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Fwd: Re: possible bug x86 2.4.2 SMP in IP receive stack], jamal |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Fwd: Re: possible bug x86 2.4.2 SMP in IP receive stack], Bob Felderman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |