| To: | ak@xxxxxx (Andi Kleen) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Fwd: Re: possible bug x86 2.4.2 SMP in IP receive stack] |
| From: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Thu, 8 Mar 2001 20:42:51 +0300 (MSK) |
| Cc: | feldy@xxxxxxxx, andrewm@xxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, pp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20010308144134.A2382@xxxxxxxxxx> from "Andi Kleen" at Mar 8, 1 02:41:34 pm |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hello! > In my experience upping it can increase NFS performance a lot. Indeed, 256K is too low. Even TCP needs ~512K window on gige. Actually, gentle hint to Bob was to estimate minimal threshold, when evicton completely stops on myrinet. This can be taken as new default, adjusted to lower values for low memory configurations. Alexey |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] RFC: fix ethernet device initialization, Jes Sorensen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Fwd: Re: possible bug x86 2.4.2 SMP in IP receive stack], Bob Felderman |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Fwd: Re: possible bug x86 2.4.2 SMP in IP receive stack], Andi Kleen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Fwd: Re: possible bug x86 2.4.2 SMP in IP receive stack], Bob Felderman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |