netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: zerocopy results on GigE

To: kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: zerocopy results on GigE
From: "Benjamin C.R. LaHaise" <blah@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 16:18:11 -0500 (EST)
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200102071939.WAA05181@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 7 Feb 2001 kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> In any case, maximal latency is 5-7usec, which is not a big number
> for TCP with jumbo mtu, where latency is dominated by bulk dma.
> But, if my arithmetics is correct, this really puts theoretical
> limit on transmission of 1500 byte frames: ~90MB/sec.
> (BTW, Jes, you enabled tx host ring in the latest driver.
>  Did you notice that it increases latency by ~1 usec?)

How many fragments are there in the typical tx packet?  Are these machines
with 64 bit / 66 MHz PCI, or just plain old 32 bit 33 MHz?  If it's a 33
MHz bus, the overhead for starting new PCI cycles to gather fragments
could be maxing out the bandwidth.  A PCI analyzer could be helpful =)

                -ben



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>