| To: | pb@xxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [ANN] 2nd STABLE release of USAGI Project |
| From: | Yuji Sekiya <sekiya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 05 Feb 2001 18:39:08 +0900 |
| Cc: | jajcus@xxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | In your message of "Mon, 05 Feb 2001 09:31:04 +0000" <E14PhzE-0003lS-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | Keio University |
| References: | <uhf29iivu.wl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <E14PhzE-0003lS-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Wanderlust/1.1.1 (Purple Rain) REMI/1.14.1 (Mushigawaōsugi) Chao/1.14.0 (Momoyama) APEL/10.2 Emacs/20.7 (i386-*-nt5.0.2195) MULE/4.1 (AOI) Meadow/IPv6-1.13 Beta1++ (TANAHASHI:61) |
At Mon, 05 Feb 2001 09:31:04 +0000, Philip Blundell <pb@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >For routers in default free zone, it is true. But how about routers in > >leaf sites ? All router should have full routes ? > > I don't see why not. A leaf site's provider ought to be able to aggregate > the routes sufficiently that there would only be a manageable number. >From IPv6 address allocation policy, TLAs should aggregate their routes, but behavior of NLAs and SLAs are not defined. Then I think it is reasonable that we can choice whether purging default route or not. -- Yuji Sekiya @ USAGI Project |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [ANN] 2nd STABLE release of USAGI Project, Philip Blundell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [ANN] 2nd STABLE release of USAGI Project, Jacek Konieczny |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [ANN] 2nd STABLE release of USAGI Project, Philip Blundell |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [ANN] 2nd STABLE release of USAGI Project, Jacek Konieczny |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |